Aisha's Leading Role in Killing of Uthman

For the Last 13 Centuries, Nasibies are blaming Shias for being Killers of Uthman (in name of fictious Story of Abdullah Ibn Saba which was forged by Saif Ibn Umar Kadhab). It’s a CHALLANGE to our opponents to show even a Single Authentic Tradition (whose chain is free of Saif Ibn Umar) which shows that it were Sabaies/Shias who killed Uthman. But there are tens of traditions (from different multiple chains) in their own books, which show that Aisha played major role in agitation and finally killing of Uthman.
But these people keep on following Saif Ibn Umar, and turning totally blind eyes towards the role of Aisha.
Aisha’s role during the life of Uthman

Many Sunni historian reported that Once Aisha went to Uthman and asked for her share of inheritance of Prophet (after so many years passed from the death of Prophet). Uthman refrained to give Aisha any money by reminding her that she was one those who testified and encouraged Abu-Bakr to refrain to pay the share of inheritance of Fatimah (AS). So if Fatimah does not have any share of inheritance, then why should she? Aisha became extremely angry at Uthman, and came out saying:
"Kill this old fool (Na'thal), for he is unbeliever."
References:

1. History of Ibn Athir, v3, p206
2. Lisan al-Arab, v14, p141
3. al-Iqd al-Farid, v4, p290
4. Sharh al-Nahj, by Ibn Abi al-Hadid, v16, pp 220-223
5. Manaqib by Khawarzmi, page 117
6. Tadkhirath al Khawwas page 38
7. Asadul Ghaba Volume 3 page 14, "Dhikr Jamal"
8. Al Istiab Volume 2 page 185
9. Al Nahaya Volume 5 page 80
10. Qamus page 500 "lughut Nathal" by Firozabadi
11. Iqd al Fareed Volume 2 page 117 "Dhikr Jamal"
12. Shaykh Mudheera page 163

Ibn Atheer in Nahaya page 80 Volume 5 and Ibn Mansur in Lisan al Arab Volume 11 Chapter "Lughuth Nathal" page 670 both record that:
"Nathal is one who has a long beard and Ayesha said kill this Nathal, by Nathal she was referring to ‘Uthman".
Note: Today Nasibies try to deny that Aisha ever called Uthman to be a “NATHAL” (Old Fool). But in coming traditions, we will see that many Sahaba were witness to this saying of Aisha, and they mentioned it to Aisha (after the killing of Uthman) that it was she herself who used to say Nathal to Uthman e.g.

1. Ubayd bin Abi Salma (His tradition is coming just in next section)
2. Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib (His tradition is also coming just in next section)

So, after these multiple references (in which this incident of Nathal has been mentioned by different Sahaba at different Times in history), Nasibies have no chance of denying this tradition.
Another Sunni historian, al-Baladhuri, writes:
"When situation in Madina became very bad, then Uthman sent Marwan bin Hakam and Abdur Rahman to Aisha to convince here that she stop inciting people against Uthman.
They came to Aisha when she was leaving for Hajj. They said: "We pray to Allah that you stay in Madina and may Allah protect Uthman from you.
Aisha answered: ""I have prepared my means of transportation and vowed to perform the pilgrimage. By God, I shall not honor your request. Upon this Marwan said: "You put the fire and you have to extinguish it now".
Upon that Aisha replied: You blame me for all this, but I wish he (Uthman) was in one of my sacks so that I could carry him. I would then through him into the sea."
Sunni reference:

1. Ansab al-Ashraf, by al-Baladhuri, part 1, v4, p74-75
2. Tabqat Ibn Sa'ad (Urdu Edition), Nafees Academy, volume 5, page 37
3. History of Ibn Sahibah al-Umairi (died 262 Hijri), page 1172

Aisha wanted that Uthman should be killed as soon as possible and her cousin Talha become the next caliph. Sunni historian Tabari writes when Uthman was besieged, Ibn Abbas came to Aisha before her journey to Mecca. Aisha appealed Ibn Abbas to incite people against Uthman. Imam Tabari recorded this conversation in his book:

Is Bibi Aisha Siddiqa/Truthful? - Sayyid Kamal al-Haydari

Salaam Alaykum, The most reliable book after the Holy Quran for the Sunnis is Saheeh al-Bukhari. The 2nd largest Narrator in that book is Bibi Aisha. Our Sunni brothers and sisters refer to her as Siddiqa (Most truthful). Here is a video asking whether she really is Siddiqa? As it has great consequences on Islamic  History

 .

IMAM BUKHARI GUSTAKH E RASOOL pbuh&hf

غم حسین میں رسول اللہ (ص) روے- صحاح سته

Click on the link to view the video

http://www.shiaforums.com/vb/f284/a-14084/#.ULon6mfPK9s

Who killed Imam Hussain? - Maulana Ishaq.

Click the link to view the video
http://www.shiaforums.com/vb/f284/who-killed-imam-hussain-maulana-ishaq-14078/#.ULok92fPK9s

Abu Bakr v/s Janabe Fatima Zehra(S.A)

ABU BAKR

who was he? A Muslim A Leader A ruler
Companion of the Prophet Muhammad (s).A senior companion.

Revered by many. The first Muslim Caliph.He became ruler after Prophet Muhammad(s).
Do you want to know more about him?
CAN YOU HANDLE THE TRUTH...?
It is reported in none other than . . .
Sahih al Bukhari

The most authentic book according to the Sunni school of thought.

Supposedly 100% authentic.

Quoting
Sahih al Bukhari Volume 5, Book 57, Hadith 61

"Allah's Apostle said,"Fatima is a part of me.and he who makes her angry,makes me angry.""

The Prophet of Islam said.
Fatima(a) is:

"The leader of all the women in paradise."&"The leader of all beieving women."

Reported in Sahih al Bukhari,volume 4, Book 56, Hadith 819

So that is the status of  FATIMAH (A)


You would think that people would respect her,treat her well and not hurt her ....

However......

The same book states:

"Fatimah, the daughter of Allah's Apostle got angry and stopped speaking to Abu Bakr,and continued assuming that attitude till she died."

Reported by Aisha, Sahih al Bukhari ,volume 4, Book 53, Hadith 325

So for six months Fatimah (a)  was angry with Abu Bakr and stopped speaking to him!

Whoever angers Fatimah (a) angers the Prophet (s).

Whoever angers the Prophet (s) angers ALLAH.

Nasibi propaganda that certain prominent Shia narrators possessed deviant beliefs

Refuting the allegation that Abdullah Ibn Saba had any link to Shiasm

In this chapter we are going to refute an article that has been circulating on different Nasibi websites with the title “RESPONSE TO THE EMBASSY OF IRAN”. The summary of this article is that in an alleged magazine called Al-Rasheed, published an article titled “Abdullah lbn Saba: Founder of Shi’aism” by an unnamed author, to which the Iranian Embassy on the 15th of August 1999 allegedly wrote a letter to the magazine expressing dissatisfaction at its contents. The unknown author defended his article by defiantly writing back to the Iranian Embassy wherein he sought to ‘prove’ his claim, that in summary was as follows::

• Abdullah Ibn Saba existed
• He was the founder of Shiaism
• He attributed traits of God to Ali bin Abi Talib (as)
• Kufa became the place where Ibn Saba’s ideas prevailed
• Three or four prominent Shia narrators of Shia Hadith books halied from Kufa
• These narrators were cursed by Imams of Ahlulbayt (as) for the same reasons

Whilst we don’t know if the article and subsequent correspondences are fact or fiction, our prime interest is the anti-Shia materials cited in the article that has attracted widespread acclaim from Nasabi quarters.
In relation to the first part of the Nasibi article, namely the existence of Abdullah Ibn Saba, we have no reason to deny this, since whether or not he existed does not effect us a single iota. What really matters are the theories attributed to him that are relied upon to draw an inference that Shias adhere to same beliefs that hence proves Ibn Saba is the founder of the Shiasm. The unknown author in his article has tried to prove that the existence and beliefs espoused by Abdullah Ibn Saba have been recorded in both Shia and Sunni books but as usual, these Nawasib merge both authentic and weak reports sp as to portray an image that best supports their evil machinations. We have already dedicated a chapter on on Abdullah Ibn Saba in our article  Who really killed Uthman? when the Pied Piper of Deception, Nasibi author Ibn al-Hashimi sought to shift the blame on those that aided and abetted Uthman’s murder from the Sahaba and Tabayeen to Abdullah Ibn Saba. Hence, our readers are advised to go through that chapter as there isn’t any need to repeat all that here, but we will just repeat the crux of their arguments, namely:

- Authentic texts prove the existence of a Yahud character called Abdullah Ibn Saba who:
a). appeared during the era of the caliphate of Ali bin Abi Talib (as)
b). attested to the divinity of Ali (as)
c). was subsequently murdered by Ali bin Abi Talib (as).

- The weak and rejected traditions [purposely fabricated by the early Sunni and Nasibi scholars] claim that:
a). a Jewish character namely Abdullah Ibn Saba appeared during the era of the caliphate of Uthman
b). claimed that the right of rulership or succession to the Prophet (s) belonged to Ali bin Abi Talib (as)
b). misguided a bulk of the Sahaba and Tabayeen who whist adhering to his footsteps launched a rebellion against the caliph and subsequently assassinated him.

The reason that the early Sunni and Nasibi authorities sought to fabricate such stories was two fold:

1. To protect the esteemed image of those Sahaba and Tabayeen that had co-ordinated popular movement against Uthman that led to his downfall. Faced with this reality, it was incumbent on the later generations of Sunni and Nasibi adherents of the State religion to shift blame elsewhere, since failure to do so would severely puncture their entire belief system that revolved around ‘each and every Sahabi is just’. They desperately needed to apportion all culpability in relation to this rebellion to Abdullah Ibn Saba as this was only means of protecting their canonical beliefs.
2. To attack the Shias of the Ahlulbayt (as) by suggesting their beliefs on Imamate echoed those of Ibn Saba, he was hence their founding father and conveniently everything bad in Islamic history was their fault alone.

Fortunately, those Sunni and Shia readers who are desirous of conducting independent research free from bias and bigotry have successfully distinguished both categories of reports regarding Abdullah Ibn Saba and have arrived an informed decision on the basis of the authentic reports, namely that Abdullah Ibn Saba affirmed belief in the divinity of Ali bin Abi Talib (as) a belief that cannot be attributed to the Shias of Ahlulbayt (as) whose belief in relation to the Ahlulbayt (as)’s legal entitlement to Imamate (leadership) was with Ahlulbayt (as) can be evidenced from the Quran and Sunnah.

Refuting the allegation that Kufa was heavily influenced by the Ghulat beliefs propagated by Abdullah Ibn Saba who subsequently fabricated beliefs and attributed it to the Imams of Ahlulbayt (as)